A Practical Comparison between Signature Approach and Other Existing Approaches in Error Detection over TCP
| dc.contributor.author | Bawaneh, Mohammed J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alkoffash, Mahmud S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alqrainy, Shihadeh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Muaidi, Hasan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-21T11:59:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-07-21T11:59:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-02 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Error coding is suited when the transmission channel is noisy. This is the case of wireless communication. So to provide a reliable digital data transmission, we should use error detection and correction algorithms. In this paper, we constructed a simulation study for four detection algorithms. The first three methods—hamming, LRC, and parity are common techniques in networking while the fourth is a proposed one called Signature. The results show that, the hamming code is the best one in term of detection but the worst one in term of execution time. Parity, LRC and signature have the same ability in detecting error, while the signature has a preference than all others methods in term of execution time. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/cn.2016.81004 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/867 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Scientific Research Publishing | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Communications and Network, 2016, 8, 31-38; | |
| dc.subject | Error Detection | en_US |
| dc.subject | Error Control Simulator | en_US |
| dc.subject | Packet Size | en_US |
| dc.subject | Detection Algorithms | en_US |
| dc.subject | Signature Detection | en_US |
| dc.title | A Practical Comparison between Signature Approach and Other Existing Approaches in Error Detection over TCP | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |