Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPegg, Jerine
dc.contributor.authorKaruku, Simon
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-28T11:02:39Z
dc.date.available2015-07-28T11:02:39Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationReading for Evidence and Interpreting Visualizations in Mathematics and Science Education 2012, pp 65-81en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-94-6091-924-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/350
dc.descriptionDOI:10.1007/978-94-6091-924-4_4en_US
dc.description.abstractCurrent reforms in science education emphasize the importance of using inquiry- based teaching strategies that engage students in formulating explanations from evidence (National Research Council [NRC], 2000). Specifically, for example, the National Science Education Standards in the United States state that students in grades 5 to 8 should “develop descriptions, explanations, predictions, and models using evidence” and “think critically and logically to make the relationships between evidence and explanations” (NRC, 1996, p. 145). As an additional example, current science education curriculum documents in Alberta include outcomes that expect students to investigate, explain, interpret, and discuss evidence for scientific concepts. For example, the Planet Earth unit in Grade 7 includes outcomes such as “Investigate and interpret evidence that Earth’s surface undergoes both gradual and sudden change” and “Interpret models that show a layered structure for Earth’s interior; and describe, in general terms, evidence for such models” (Alberta Learning, 2003, p. 27).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSensePublishersen_US
dc.titleExplanatory reasoning in Junior high Science textbooksen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record