Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Christina M.
dc.contributor.authorLonsdorf, Erick
dc.contributor.authorNeel, Maile C.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Neal M.
dc.contributor.authorRicketts, Taylor H.
dc.contributor.authorWinfree, Rachael
dc.contributor.authorBommarco, Riccardo
dc.contributor.authorBrittain, Claire
dc.contributor.authorBurley, Alana L.
dc.contributor.authorCariveau, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCarvalheiro
dc.contributor.authorChacoff, Natacha P.
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, Saul A.
dc.contributor.authorDanforth, Bryan N.
dc.contributor.authorDudenhoffer, Jan-Hendrick
dc.contributor.authorElle, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorGaines, Hanna R.
dc.contributor.authorGaribaldi, Lucas A.
dc.contributor.authorGratton, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorHolzschuh, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorIsaacs, Rufus
dc.contributor.authorJavorek, Steven K.
dc.contributor.authorJha, Shalene
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Alexandra M.
dc.contributor.authorKrewenka, Kristin
dc.contributor.authorMandelik, Yael
dc.contributor.authorMayfield, Margaret M.
dc.contributor.authorMorandin, Lora
dc.contributor.authorNeame, Lisa A.
dc.contributor.authorOtieno, Mark
dc.contributor.authorPark, Mia
dc.contributor.authorPotts, Simon G.
dc.contributor.authorRundlof, Maj
dc.contributor.authorSaez, Agustin
dc.contributor.authorSteffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
dc.contributor.authorTaki, Hisatomo
dc.contributor.authorViana, Blandina F.
dc.contributor.authorWestphal, Catrin
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Julianna K.
dc.contributor.authorGreenleaf, Sara S.
dc.contributor.authorKremen, Claire
dc.contributor.authorCarvalheiro, Luisa G.
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-27T16:05:15Z
dc.date.available2015-07-27T16:05:15Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/345
dc.descriptiondoi: 10.1111/ele.12082en_US
dc.description.abstractBees provide essential pollination services that are potentially affected both by local farm management and the surrounding landscape. To better understand these different factors, we modelled the relative effects of landscape composition (nesting and floral resources within foraging distances), landscape configuration (patch shape, interpatch connectivity and habitat aggregation) and farm management (organic vs. conventional and local-scale field diversity), and their interactions, on wild bee abundance and richness for 39 crop systems globally. Bee abundance and richness were higher in diversified and organic fields and in landscapes comprising more high-quality habitats; bee richness on conventional fields with low diversity benefited most from high-quality surrounding land cover. Landscape configuration effects were weak. Bee responses varied slightly by biome. Our synthesis reveals that pollinator persistence will depend on both the maintenance of high-quality habitats around farms and on local management practices that may offset impacts of intensive monoculture agriculture.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subjectAgri-environment schemesen_US
dc.subjectdiversified farming systemen_US
dc.subjectecologically scaled landscape indexen_US
dc.subjectecosystem servicesen_US
dc.subjectfarm managementen_US
dc.subjecthabitat fragmentationen_US
dc.subjectlandscape structureen_US
dc.subjectorganic farmingen_US
dc.subjectpollinatorsen_US
dc.titleA global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record