A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems
View/ Open
Date
2013Author
Kennedy, Christina M.
Lonsdorf, Erick
Neel, Maile C.
Williams, Neal M.
Ricketts, Taylor H.
Winfree, Rachael
Bommarco, Riccardo
Brittain, Claire
Burley, Alana L.
Cariveau, Daniel
Carvalheiro
Chacoff, Natacha P.
Cunningham, Saul A.
Danforth, Bryan N.
Dudenhoffer, Jan-Hendrick
Elle, Elizabeth
Gaines, Hanna R.
Garibaldi, Lucas A.
Gratton, Claudio
Holzschuh, Andrea
Isaacs, Rufus
Javorek, Steven K.
Jha, Shalene
Klein, Alexandra M.
Krewenka, Kristin
Mandelik, Yael
Mayfield, Margaret M.
Morandin, Lora
Neame, Lisa A.
Otieno, Mark
Park, Mia
Potts, Simon G.
Rundlof, Maj
Saez, Agustin
Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
Taki, Hisatomo
Viana, Blandina F.
Westphal, Catrin
Wilson, Julianna K.
Greenleaf, Sara S.
Kremen, Claire
Carvalheiro, Luisa G.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Bees provide essential pollination services that are potentially affected both by local farm management and the surrounding landscape. To better understand these different factors, we modelled the relative effects of landscape composition (nesting and floral resources within foraging distances), landscape configuration (patch shape, interpatch connectivity and habitat aggregation) and farm management (organic vs. conventional and local-scale field diversity), and their interactions, on wild bee abundance and richness for 39 crop
systems globally. Bee abundance and richness were higher in diversified and organic fields and in landscapes comprising more high-quality habitats; bee richness on conventional fields with low diversity benefited most from high-quality surrounding land cover. Landscape configuration effects were weak. Bee responses varied slightly by biome. Our synthesis reveals that pollinator persistence will depend on both the maintenance of high-quality habitats around farms and on local management practices that may offset
impacts of intensive monoculture agriculture.