Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSeth, Rama
dc.contributor.authorChowdary, Bobbur Abhilash
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-09T08:51:42Z
dc.date.available2018-07-09T08:51:42Z
dc.date.issued2017-08
dc.identifier.citationTheoretical Economics Letters, 2017, 7, 1134-1149en_US
dc.identifier.issn2162-2086
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2017.75077
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1748
dc.description.abstractBehavioural finance has received a major impetus over the last two decades. In this paper, we discuss the foundations which have helped in this paradigm shift from traditional Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) to the more experimental branch of finance, namely behavioural finance. We discuss EMH in the context of its critics, and present alternative theories as well as psychological concepts that are useful in understanding behavioural finance. We conduct 3 separate experiments to test Prospect theory, a popular theory put forth by Kahneman & Tversky [1]. We conduct the experiments on a different type of respondent group than that has been used in the past. Using a relatively homogenous group well versed in probability and statistics, we find that career professionals exhibit less biases than student subjects that have been used in such experiments in the past.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScientific Researchen_US
dc.subjectExperimental Economicsen_US
dc.subjectBehavioural Financeen_US
dc.subjectBehavioural Economicsen_US
dc.subjectProspect Theoryen_US
dc.subjectExperimental Financeen_US
dc.subjectEfficient Market Hypothesisen_US
dc.titleBehavioural Finance: A Re-Examination of Prospect Theoryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record