Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNissim, Ben David
dc.contributor.authorTchai, Tavor
dc.contributor.authorZvi, Winer
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-09T06:53:18Z
dc.date.available2018-07-09T06:53:18Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.citationTheoretical Economics Letters, 2016, 6, 494-506en_US
dc.identifier.issn2162-2086
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4236/tel.2016.63057
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1722
dc.description.abstractMost economists, who refer to utility as representing wellbeing, do so under the assumption that utility increases with consumption. In contrast, lately researchers have found evidence that individuals' wellbeing is by far a more complicated matter than to be represented solely by their consumption choices. Adopting a broader approach to human wellbeing, we have modified the traditional theory to include income aspirations. Following this new line of thinking, this paper assumes that individuals seek to minimize the gap between their consumption aspirations and their consumption desires, namely minimizing their frustration. We present an overlapping generation model and assume that desires increase with current and lag consumption. Our theoretical results show that in an economy with agents minimizing frustration, as greed increases, the steady state level of capital might be higher while people would certainly be more miserable.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScientific Researchen_US
dc.subjectFrustrationen_US
dc.subjectDesiresen_US
dc.subjectEquilibriumen_US
dc.subjectTwo Period Consumption Modelen_US
dc.titleGreed Supports Economic Growth But Might Make Us More Miserableen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record