Setting the record straight in socio- economic rights adjudication: The Mitu-Bell Welfare Society Supreme Court of Kenya judgment

dc.contributor.authorMiyandazi, Victoria
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-08T13:05:28Z
dc.date.available2023-02-08T13:05:28Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractA leading criticism of the Mitu-Bell Welfare Society decision in the Supreme Court of Kenya is that it fell short of achieving the transformative effects expected similar to South Africa’s Irene Grootboom. One such critique has been provided by Ian Mwiti Mathenge in his paper which this article responds to by asserting that the Court addressed relevant issues to Kenya’s jurisprudential needs. Specifically, the Court clearly affirmed evictees’ rights to seek redress including compensation, adequate notice, dignified treatment and even the provision of alternative land for resettlement. The analysis of the case also acknowledges the Court’s interpretation on the place of international law in Kenya, and areas for future research and development.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKabarak Journal of Law and Ethics, Vol 6 (2022)en_US
dc.identifier.issn27071596
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.embuni.ac.ke/handle/embuni/4205
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKabarak Universityen_US
dc.titleSetting the record straight in socio- economic rights adjudication: The Mitu-Bell Welfare Society Supreme Court of Kenya judgmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Setting+the+record+straight+in+socio-economic+rights+adjudication++The+Mitu-Bell+Welfare+Society+Supreme+Court+of+Kenya+judgment.pdf
Size:
3.01 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full text
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections