A Practical Comparison between Signature Approach and Other Existing Approaches in Error Detection over TCP

Bawaneh, Mohammed J.; Alkoffash, Mahmud S.; Alqrainy, Shihadeh; Muaidi, Hasan

dc.contributor.author	Bawaneh, Mohammed J.
dc.contributor.author	Alkoffash, Mahmud S.
dc.contributor.author	Alqrainy, Shihadeh
dc.contributor.author	Muaidi, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned	2016-07-21T11:59:11Z
dc.date.available	2016-07-21T11:59:11Z
dc.date.issued	2016-02
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/cn.2016.81004
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/867
dc.description.abstract	Error coding is suited when the transmission channel is noisy. This is the case of wireless communication. So to provide a reliable digital data transmission, we should use error detection and correction algorithms. In this paper, we constructed a simulation study for four detection algorithms. The first three methods—hamming, LRC, and parity are common techniques in networking while the fourth is a proposed one called Signature. The results show that, the hamming code is the best one in term of detection but the worst one in term of execution time. Parity, LRC and signature have the same ability in detecting error, while the signature has a preference than all others methods in term of execution time.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Scientific Research Publishing	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Communications and Network, 2016, 8, 31-38;
dc.subject	Error Detection	en_US
dc.subject	Error Control Simulator	en_US
dc.subject	Packet Size	en_US
dc.subject	Detection Algorithms	en_US
dc.subject	Signature Detection	en_US
dc.title	A Practical Comparison between Signature Approach and Other Existing Approaches in Error Detection over TCP	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US