Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBawaneh, Mohammed J.
dc.contributor.authorAlkoffash, Mahmud S.
dc.contributor.authorAlqrainy, Shihadeh
dc.contributor.authorMuaidi, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-21T11:59:11Z
dc.date.available2016-07-21T11:59:11Z
dc.date.issued2016-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4236/cn.2016.81004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/867
dc.description.abstractError coding is suited when the transmission channel is noisy. This is the case of wireless communication. So to provide a reliable digital data transmission, we should use error detection and correction algorithms. In this paper, we constructed a simulation study for four detection algorithms. The first three methods—hamming, LRC, and parity are common techniques in networking while the fourth is a proposed one called Signature. The results show that, the hamming code is the best one in term of detection but the worst one in term of execution time. Parity, LRC and signature have the same ability in detecting error, while the signature has a preference than all others methods in term of execution time.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScientific Research Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCommunications and Network, 2016, 8, 31-38;
dc.subjectError Detectionen_US
dc.subjectError Control Simulatoren_US
dc.subjectPacket Sizeen_US
dc.subjectDetection Algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectSignature Detectionen_US
dc.titleA Practical Comparison between Signature Approach and Other Existing Approaches in Error Detection over TCPen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record