dc.contributor.author | Perrick, Michael | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-24T11:46:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-24T11:46:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-11 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Open Journal of Philosophy, 2016, 6, 446-454 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2163-9442 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2016.64042 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2018 | |
dc.description.abstract | Appearances notwithstanding, in this paper we do not discuss the Gettier problem.
The question at issue is whether one can be justified in believing a false proposition.
So, what is at stake is the relation between justified belief and falseness. In his famous
paper, Gettier presupposes explicitly that one can be justified in believing a false
proposition (Gettier’s “first point”). He makes essential use of this point in arguing
for his well-known Gettier cases. I will prove that this point, in Gettier’s robust reading,
is untenable since it leads to incompatible or contradictory consequences. It is
only in a much weaker sense than we find in Gettier’s paper that it seems possible to
be justified in believing a false proposition. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Scientific Research | en_US |
dc.subject | False Belief | en_US |
dc.subject | Gettier | en_US |
dc.title | Justification and False Belief: Gettier’s First Point | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |