Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPerrick, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-24T11:46:21Z
dc.date.available2018-07-24T11:46:21Z
dc.date.issued2016-11
dc.identifier.citationOpen Journal of Philosophy, 2016, 6, 446-454en_US
dc.identifier.issn2163-9442
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2016.64042
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2018
dc.description.abstractAppearances notwithstanding, in this paper we do not discuss the Gettier problem. The question at issue is whether one can be justified in believing a false proposition. So, what is at stake is the relation between justified belief and falseness. In his famous paper, Gettier presupposes explicitly that one can be justified in believing a false proposition (Gettier’s “first point”). He makes essential use of this point in arguing for his well-known Gettier cases. I will prove that this point, in Gettier’s robust reading, is untenable since it leads to incompatible or contradictory consequences. It is only in a much weaker sense than we find in Gettier’s paper that it seems possible to be justified in believing a false proposition.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScientific Researchen_US
dc.subjectFalse Beliefen_US
dc.subjectGettieren_US
dc.titleJustification and False Belief: Gettier’s First Pointen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record