Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFarhat, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-09T07:19:53Z
dc.date.available2018-07-09T07:19:53Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.citationTheoretical Economics Letters, 2016, 6, 1230-1243en_US
dc.identifier.issn2162-2086
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4236/tel.2016.66116
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1730
dc.description.abstractThis study explores the impact of government intervention on the evolution of cooperation using a popular framework for understanding cooperative behavior (the public goods game). Agents either contribute to the production of a shared public good or free-ride on the efforts of others. This game traditionally results in mass free-riding (a sub-optimal outcome), in which case a government can intercede by levying taxes and providing the public good to increase welfare. Is this still the case when looking at an evolutionary framework with natural selection? Theoretical results suggest that the government “levels the playing field”, allowing cooperative and uncooperative behavior to coexist longer than it ordinarily would, but it cannot change the course of evolution.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScientific Researchen_US
dc.subjectPublic Goods Gameen_US
dc.subjectCooperative Behavioren_US
dc.subjectGovernment Interventionen_US
dc.subjectEvolutionen_US
dc.titleThe Evolution of Pro-Social Behavior and the Role of the Governmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record