Males at High Risk for Breast Cancer: Who Are They and How Should We Screen Them?
View/ Open
Date
2014-07Author
Swergold, Natalie
Murthy, Vijayashree
Chamberlain, Ronald S.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: It is estimated that 2240 males in the United States will develop invasive breast cancer
(BC) in 2013, resulting in 410 deaths. Overall, male breast cancers (MBCs) are diagnosed with
larger tumor size, more frequent lymphatic invasion, and advanced tumor stage compared to their
female counterparts. Several risk factors have been elucidated for the development of MBC, and
this paper aims to critically review the existing literature on at-risk populations and provide
screening recommendations. Methods: A comprehensive search for all published studies on populations
at risk for MBC using PubMed, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar was performed (1982-
2013). The search focused specifically on genetic and epidemiologic risk factors, and screening for
MBC. Keywords searched included “male breast cancer risk factors”, “male breast cancer epidemiology”,
and “male breast cancer genetics”. A total of 34 studies involving 4,865,819 patients were
identified. Results: Five studies (N = 327,667) focused primarily on family history of breast cancer
as a risk factor for MBC. 15% - 20% of men with BC have a family history of breast or ovarian cancer,
and a family history of BC among first-degree relatives confers a 2- to 3-fold increase in MBC
risk (odds ratio = 3.3). Seventeen studies (N = 5451) analyzed associations between several heritable
genes and MBC. Lifetime MBC risk among BRCA1 mutation carriers is 1% - 5%, while MBC
risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers is higher and varies between 4% - 40%. Less clear associations
between MBC and PALB2, Androgen Receptor gene, CYP17, and CHEK2 mutations have also been
documented. Five studies (N = 16,667) have addressed occupational risk factors for MBC. An 8-fold
increase in MBC is reported in males working in the cosmetic cream manufacturing, and the motor
vehicle industries. A meta-analysis of 18 trials also identified electromagnetic field exposure as a
potential MBC risk, though causation remains undocumented. Eleven studies (N = 4,843,598) analyzed
the role of abnormalities in the androgen-to-estrogen ratio as a risk factor for MBC. Conditions
associated with increased MBC risk include Klinefelter’s syndrome (relative risk, RR = 29.64),
obesity (RR = 1.98), orchitis/epididymitis (RR = 1.84), and gynecomastia (RR = 5.86). Conclusion: Routine screening for MBC should be considered in all high risk male populations, including those
with a prior history of breast carcinoma, a strong family history of BC (defined as an affected
mother or sister), a positive BRCA2 mutation status (regardless of family history), and men diagnosed
with Klinefelter’s syndrome, or those in the chemical or motor vehicle industries. Genetic
testing for BRCA2 should be recommended for all MBC patients. Increased public and physician
education on MBC is necessary to raise awareness about this rare disease and the need for screening
of at-risk populations.