Dengue Vaccines: Challenge and Confrontation
View/ Open
Date
2011-11Author
Perng, Guey C.
Lei, Huan-Yao
Lin, Yee-Shin
Chokephaibulkit, Kulkanya
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Dengue has been recognized as one of the most important vector-borne human diseases. The disease is induced by
dengue virus infection resulting from the bite of an infected Aedes spp. mosquito after imbibing the tainted blood from
animals or patients. Dynamic clinical spectrums ranging from asymptomatic, undifferentiated fever, typical dengue
fever (DF), dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS) have been well documented. Initially,
the disease was mainly restricted in tropical and subtropical zones. However, with factors such as ineffective vector
control, frequency of human migration, unplanned urbanization, and changing climate temperature, the disease has
been spotted at almost every territory of the earth. Dengue has been associated with human disease for more than two
centuries. Although classic DF is viewed as a self-limited illness, subjects normally resolve within two weeks and recover
without any noticeable complications or sequelae, some of these infected individuals may progress to lifethreatening
DHF/DSS, characterized with plasma leakage due to an increase in capillary permeability. The significantly
increased public health threat and the burden of morbidity and mortality of dengue globally has caught the attention
of public officials and prompted an action to find a way to contain and prevent the disease. The lack of specific
dengue therapeutics has led to an emphasis on vaccine development, one of the best and effective strategies to reduce
and prevent the illness. Making a dengue vaccine has been attempted more than six decades; although some of these
products are in clinical trials, vaccine development for the prevention of dengue disease is still at its infancy. So far no
dengue vaccine is available for the public. Dengue vaccine development may be hindered by the complexity of the
clinical presentations, which implicates that multiple pathogenic mechanisms are involved in dengue disease. Some of
these elements will be discussed in the current review. Opening up discussion on these pros and cons and engaging in
more research to understand these features would not only improve the understanding of the pathogenesis of the dengue
virus infection but also pave a new tactic to develop a safer and effective dengue vaccine