Genotype X Environment Interaction of Inbred Lines of Maize (Zea Mays L.) and Stability of Crosses in Kiambu and Embu Counties, Kenya.
View/ Open
Date
2016-05Author
Muriuki, J. M.
Njoka, Fredrick M.
Leley, P. K.
Manene, D. W.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Despite the fact that virtually all households in Kenya grow maize over 60% of them are net maize buyers because
they do not produce enough for their consumption. Kenya’s current food supply situation and outlook give cause for serious
concern. Maize is the main staple food averaging over 80% of total cereals (rice, wheat, millet and sorghum) in Kenya.
Maize stocks are estimated to be depleted at all levels throughout the country. Due to increasing temperatures as a result of
global warming and consequent dropping of water table, there has been shortage leading to increased demand for maize and
its products. This study was conducted to determine the stability of respective single crosses in different environments. The
trials were conducted in 2012 at experimental stations of Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization
(KALRO), Muguga South and KALRO Embu in Kiambu and Embu counties of Kenya respectively. The study was
conducted with 36 crosses. The stability of crosses was determined and interaction between the genotypes and environment
was also determined among the crosses.The experiment was laid out in a 6 x 6 lattice complete randomized block design
(RBCD) with two replications. Data was subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Genstat 12 program for
individual single crosses as well as for combined environments considering environments as random effects and crosses as
fixed effects. Mean separation was done using Tukey’s comparison method at 0.05% significance level. Data on grain yield
showed no significant difference between the sites but there was significant difference on grain yield. Data on disease scores
where natural infestation was visually scored showed majority of the crosses had a score of one confirming their near
immunity status. Further research on stability of the crosses can be done not only in the research sites but also in other
regions of Kenya. For grain yield improvement crosses MUL508 x MUL688(entry 9), POPA x MUL141(entry 19),
MUL513 x MUL114 (entry 31) and MUL513 x CN244 (entry 33) can further be evaluated and eventually released to
farmers as they indicated promising relationship with yield potential compared to other crosses. The results will be useful to
breeders and farmers in selecting the potential parental materials for improvement in maize breeding programs.