dc.contributor.author | Künzler, Daniel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-02T07:27:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-02T07:27:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. In 2012, this culminated in the adoption of the ILO Recommendation concerning national floors of social protection | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12095 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1452 | |
dc.description | full text | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | With social security provisions in Kenya remainingunder-reported in the more recent literature, this overviewcovers recent reforms in key areas of the country’ s social secu-rity system. In the health sector and in old-age pension provi-sion social security is still mainly workerist (biased towardthose in formal employment), and attempts to expand cove-rage have had limited effect only – cash transfer programmes,for instance, have been expanded but in practice they do notuniversally cover the entitled categories. Thus, although theKenyan social security system now has a considerable pro-poor social assistance component it remains biased towardthose in formal employment, to the benefit of the highest in-come quintile. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Fribourg, Department of Social Sciences, Switzerland | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | International Social Security Review, Vol. 69, 1/2016;69, 1/2016 | |
dc.subject | coverage, social policy, provident fund, socialinsurance, social assistance, Kenya, Africa | en_US |
dc.title | Social security reforms in Kenya: Towards a workeristor a citizenship-based system? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |