Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIzmailova, Azar
dc.contributor.authorKornevab, Diana
dc.contributor.authorKozhemiakinc, Artem*
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-15T13:11:59Z
dc.date.available2018-05-15T13:11:59Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.identifier.citationProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 235 ( 2016 ) 189 – 197en_US
dc.identifier.uri(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1438
dc.descriptionfull texten_US
dc.description.abstractOne of the reasons to distinguish project management as a separate field of knowledge is the uncertainty. The way we manage the uncertainty in the project (and risk management in particular), has direct influence on the project duration and its success. According to multiple studies performed for the traditional project management methods, only 44% of the projects finish in time. 70% of the projects reduce the amount of planned work, 30% of the projects simply die unrealized. Even so nowadays, with new tools and techniques, that numbers tend to decrease, the overall picture says that we, as a project manager, perform our work poorly. This article examines the use of a relatively new method of project management, Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM), comparing it with the traditional approach to project management.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocial and Behavioral Sciences 235 ( 2016 );189 – 197
dc.subjectProject management, Critical Chain Project Management (CCPM), Theory of Constraints (TOC), Buffer, Parkinson's Law, Critical pathen_US
dc.titleProject management using the buffers of time and resourcesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record